|
by Sean Savanah
I would like to bring your attention to a new technique small start-up studios are using with more established ones - I have received about 4 emails from anonymous hotmail accounts asking for quotes, 2 of which have just asked for my terms and conditions. These requests are obviously bogus - the briefs are vague, first names only without any contact numbers or business names.
I have e-mailed them back asking for further information, a chance to meet and get no response. I toyed with one request where I sent a blank Word document, they responded by saying there was nothing in it, I did the same again, same result and then suggested I fax it and got no reply.
To top it off, I was told by a design colleague that a friend of his was gloating about using this technique so he could get a sample of how other design studios prepare their quotes and to establish their terms and conditions.
I'm certainly not against helping young studios start up with giving them advice and samples, but when it is done like this I have no respect for them.
I am not sure if this is happening to other studios. I am bringing it to your attention so that you do not fall into the trap of spending numerous hours compiling a quote just so that parasites like these can get what we have worked hard to establish for free.
| Feedback by Sean | Thursday, 28 August 2003 |
"to (), an interesting response, I presume that you have not been subjected to this scenario? please help me out - I would like you to give me a proposal for a 100pp book, 100,000 copies, I will need 3 print quotes, 3 x full page illustrations, photography and copywriting - how long do you think this would take to put together?
The issue here is not about designers wanting to increase their business knowledge, it's about the disrespect of fellow designers."
"This IS an old, established strategy, and while it can be
affronting to the subjected studio, we can't justify an indignant attitude
to the practice. It's easy to assume that the individuals or firms carrying
out this practice are nothing but "parasites", but there is very little
choice.
While the AGDA website claims that:
"...there is no need to be sneaky about gathering this info! Newcomers can
join AGDA, use the many resources we provide, including this site, and use
their membership to meet and discuss these matters with more experienced
colleagues."
..Well, let's bear in mind that there are so many variable factors in this
industry, and the value of each artist's work is dependent on a variety of
factors that may or may not be relevant to another artist.
This is especially so in areas outside of metropolitan areas, where the
value of design in the mind of the client (mainly small printing firms and
one-off clients) is based on differing factors and local economies, and
cannot be based on the advice of metropolitan-based firms or colleagues.
In any case, speaking from the point of view of someone based in
non-metropolitan Qld - and who has little time to attend conferences, let
alone get to a metropolitan area to do so - the suggested "meeting" of like
minds simply doesn't happen.
Furthermore, the limited demand for high-quality design in non-metropolitan
areas, makes each design firm naturally paranoid and defensive. It is pure
fantasy to assume that a young designer need only meet with local colleagues
to gain legitimate advice on how to charge. The advice offered is going to
be dubious at best!
Aside from all of this, where exactly can an AGDA member get hold of such
information through this website? The subject is certainly touched upon,
but where are the solid facts and figures?
This is a rhetorical question, of course; there can't be any solid facts and
figures, for the reasons outlined above.
So, what's left to do? What the competitive industries have always done: Be
sneaky.
Let's not be offended, and let's not presume to condemn the perpetrators.
Most likely, you will at some point be working for a firm that adopts this
practice as a legitimate research tool. Plenty of well-established firms do
it. Would you resign your position in protest?"
| Feedback by mauro bertolini | Monday, 13 May 2002 |
"Its still going on...
We have set up a standard 'more info please' letter that gets sent off when ever we get one of these requests - it saves time.
Funny.... rarely do we recieve a response."
| Feedback by Kevin Cooke | Monday, 11 March 2002 |
"'Totally agree' - at this moment I am trying to get my own
business of the ground and although during all my time studying I have not
been shown how to set up good business practices or how to quote for a job -
I would never think of carrying the above mentioned practice. I have created
my own method by searching the net for any information I can find about
designing and costing. It has taken me just over 12 months and I have
finally worked out and set up a costing, quoting and invoicing system that
seems to work but at the same time I have left room for improvements if need
be. As far as approaching other firms for help I unfortunately have not had
much luck with this as they seem to just brush you off as you are an
unknown.
Cookie"
| Feedback by Louis A. Salguero | Tuesday, 12 February 2002 |
"Dear Sean:
It is petty some people are willing to go to that extent, but I dissagree
with your generalisation of anybody using a hotmail account is bogus. I do
use a hotmail account myself, not because I am cheap, but because I lack the
resorces to have a business provider, as time allows there will be a web
site set up, a proper email account, fax machines and much more. I am not
one to go and cheat ideas from others, luckily I have the support of a much
wiser mentor and that is where I get my ideas from. I do not understand why
anyone would want to become a designer of any sort and then not use their
own creativity to come up with a great business concept, but that does not
only apply to the "small bloke" that is a fact on everyday business activity
even big corporations are encouraged to peep into their neighbor's
garden....."
| Feedback by Steven Donald | Thursday, 7 February 2002 |
"This is hardly a "New Technique"....competition analysis,
research or similiar such "Mystery Shopping" is common place in most
industries... It's called business intelligence gathering. While I agree a
certain amount of prospect pre-qualification is a prudent strategy to weed
out tyre kickers and time wasters, I think the term "Sneaky", as used by the
editor responding to Nathan's response, could as easily be replaced with
"Entrepreneurial".
This does not extend however to stealing and plagiarism. Should the
intellectual property of the firm be utilised on an "as is" basis by the
offending firm, and represented as their own, then the line has been
crossed. It has been my experience that firms operating in this manner lack
the resources, creativity or talent to exist for any length of time. However
should this information be used to create benchmarks and industry standards
by which firm bases (not regurgitates) their own operating procedures,
costings etc. I believe it is a valid research method. It is "Naive" to
think that just because the industry is a creative one that common place
business methods will not be utilised.
Do not worry about what others may take from you, concentrate on what you
put out there and the rest should take care of itself."
| Feedback by Nathan Forward | Tuesday, 8 January 2002 |
"To whom it may concern,
Although I agree that this method of acquiring information is hardly
professional to the "seemingly" open culture of the graphic arts community,
it does however reveal a significant problem worth discussing. Little
information on pricing and costs, not to mention terms and conditions are
rarely addressed in art schools and learning institutions, leaving students
with little or no knowledge of these practices upon entering the indutry.
Many new players also find the idea (and actuality) of walking into an
established design house for help intimidating and frustrating when their
presence may be viewed negatively. They are often seen as purely a
competitor rather than a welcome member to the industry. Therefore, even
though I agree whole heartedly that the idea of gleaning information
underhandedly out of established businesses is wrong, there is obviously a
need to inform or establish some standard to help newcomers to the industry."
[Editor's Note: I think the point that Sean is making is that there is no
need to be sneaky about gathering this info! Newcomers can join AGDA, use
the many resources we provide, including this site, and use their membership
to meet and discuss these matters with more experienced colleagues.]
| Feedback by Cameron Marshall | Monday, 7 January 2002 |
"Sean,
I've had about half a dozen similar requests. I too have found that simply
by asking for their name, company name, address, telephone and facsimile
numbers for my records seems to elicit no response and therefore no further
waste of my time.
Cameron"
"This I can heartly agree with.
Originaly comming from Adelaide, i am an international designer working for
a multi-national American company in Beijing China. The design industry here
is frought with just such instances and on a somewhat grander scale than
what you face in Australia. There is such incompetence, even when it comes
to outsourcing local and some of the larger entities which are using similar
tacktics to stay on top and one step ahead. What is frustrating is that i
have done business all over China Including Honk Kong and it is the same
[differing in degree's of application] all over....
Things in Australia aren't as bad as they are over sea's. Here they use such
idea's as design tactics, amongst others, to utilise other expertise and
other design mentalities.
Rest easy....
Best regards Sean"
| Feedback by Lucy Prior | Monday, 7 January 2002 |
"Thank you for taking the time to
inform other colleges about this trick, it is tough enough out there at the
moment with out wasting precious time on some thing like that. Time is money
so I thank you again for saving what could have been lost time ( money )
Lucy"
|